Search Results for "regional provident fund commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "regional provident fund commissioner"

222 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Trade Union in Provident Fund Coverage Dispute — Factory Held Not a Branch of Trading Firm Under Section 2A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Common ownership and consolidation of accounts insufficient to treat two separate establishments as one integral unit for PF coverage.

3 Feb 2010

The appellant, Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh, a trade union, filed a writ appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing its...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Against Reduction of Damages; Upholds Tribunal's Appellate Power to Modify Quantum. The Court held that the Tribunal under Section 7L of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 has power to reduce damages imposed under Section 14B, and the parallel power of the Central Board under Paragraph 32B of the Scheme does not exclude the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

15 Dec 2010

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner imposed damages on the respondent employer for delayed contribution of provident fund dues for various period...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Pension Claims of Former U.P. Roadways Employees Absorbed in Corporation - Employees Not Holding Pensionable Posts Under U.P. Civil Service Regulations. The Court held that employees of a temporary department of the State Government, absorbed in a statutory corporation, are not entitled to pension as they did not hold pensionable posts under the U.P. Civil Service Regulations.

26 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by former employees of Uttar Pradesh Roadways (a temporary department of the State Governme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes EPF Recovery Notices Against Purchaser of Company in Liquidation — Section 17B of EPF Act Not Attracted When Transfer is by Official Liquidator Under Court Supervision. The court held that the Official Liquidator is not the 'employer' under Section 17B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the sale by him does not attract joint liability for prior provident fund dues.

23 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Vibhu Drinks Private Limited, purchased a property from the Official Liquidator of M/s Niranjan Ayurved Bhavan Limited (a company in l...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Attachment Order in EPF Recovery Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Pending Appeal Held Illegal Under Section 7A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

29 Jan 2018

The petitioner, M/s G4S Secure Solutions India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes EPFAT and APFC Orders Levying Damages Under Section 14B of EPF Act Due to Non-Speaking Order. APFC Mechanically Applied Maximum Damages Without Considering Employer's Written Objections, Contravening the Discretionary Nature of Para 32A.

3 Feb 2012

The petitioner, a distinct establishment initially treated as part of Asia Transport Company, had been remitting EPF contributions at 10% under that b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Challenge to EPF Damages Order — Delay and Lack of Jurisdictional Error. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any error in the order imposing damages under Section 14-B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.

18 Sep 2013

The petitioner, M/s Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd, challenged an order dated 19.05.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner imposing damage...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Provident Fund Recovery Proceedings Due to Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The court set aside the order making the EPF Act applicable from 1982 and recovery proceedings, directing fresh show cause notice and hearing.

25 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Shrirampur Education Society, a registered society under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, filed a writ petition challenging an orde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Apparel Companies Challenging Provident Fund Damages Order. Establishment of separate code number for each unit does not absolve liability under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

24 Jan 2013

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by apparel companies (M/s J.D. Clothing Company, M/s Gokaldas India, M/s Wear Craft Apparels, and others...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to EPF Liability Determination. Review Application Under Section 7-B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Rejected as No Error Apparent on Record and Delay Not Explained.

18 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Municipal Council, Dhamangaon, a civic body established in 1945 and governed by the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats a...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)