Search Results for "recreational space"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "recreational space"

106 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in TDR Case — Principle of Land Division Proportionate to Built-Up Area Applicable When TDR Distributed Across Layout. The Court set aside the Competent Authority's order granting conveyance of 929.84 sq.mtrs and remanded for fresh consideration under Section 11(3) of MOFA, holding that GR dated 22 June 2018 does not mandate conveyance of only plinth and appurtenant area.

25 Jun 2026

The Petitioner, Neelkanth Mansions & Infrastructure Private Limited, is a developer of a large integrated project named 'Neelkanth Greens' at Majiwada...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Additional Amenity TDR in Garden Reservation Case — Municipal Corporation Cannot Deny TDR for Land Reserved for Garden on Grounds of Non-Construction of Road. Held that once land is reserved for a garden and developed as such, the owner is entitled to additional amenity TDR under DCR 33(9) read with Section 126 of the MRTP Act, 1966, irrespective of whether a road is constructed.

3 Apr 2024

The petitioners, Vijay Nagar Apartments (a partnership firm) and its partner Dhaval Ajmera, owned approximately 98,369.1 square meters of land in Vill...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

15 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

8 May 2023

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.

3 Jul 2020

The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Playground to Trust for School Construction. Lease of Public Land for Educational Purpose Held Valid as Playground Not Reserved as Recreational Ground in Development Plan.

13 Mar 2013

The petitioners, residents of Oshiwara and Lokhandwala area of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on 13/08/2012 challenging the lease of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Property Dispute Over Alleged Illegal Construction. Court upholds trial court's order restraining construction pending determination of title and compliance with municipal regulations.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal against an ad-interim injunction granted by the trial court restraining the appellants from carrying out construction on a...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)