Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

1368 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1368 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Employees' Compensation Case — Insurance Company Held Liable for Tractor Accident. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Absence of Written Contract, and Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability for Breach of Policy Conditions Without Proper Evidence.

The present appeal was filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, by the claimants (widow and minor sons of the deceased Vasanta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Lack of Negligence Proof. Claimants Failed to Establish Rash and Negligent Driving by Truck Driver, Resulting in Setting Aside of Tribunal's Award.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 3.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Covered Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Held that the expression 'any person' in Section 163-A includes a pillion rider and that the petition is maintainable even in a hit-and-run case.

The appellant, Lalita wd/o Rajkumar Sawalkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was later converted to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Death of 15-Year-Old Boy Due to Contributory Negligence. Owner of Tractor Held Liable for Negligence of Driver but Compensation Reduced by 50% for Deceased's Contributory Negligence in Sitting on Tractor.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the original claimants (respondents No. 1 to 4) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Injured Claimant and Dismisses Appeal by Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Head Injury and Permanent Disability. Claimant awarded Rs. 8,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum from date of petition.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 25.11.2006, when the claimant, P. Bharath, a 20-year-old student, was riding his bicycl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case — Negligent Driving Resulting in Death and Injuries Justifies Dismissal; Labour Court's Reinstatement Order Quashed as Perverse Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which had set asi...