Search Results for "private company become public"

1805 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1805 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order Refusing Transfer of Company Petition. Chairman's Quasi-Judicial Order Held Amenable to Section 10F but Lacks Power to Transfer Part-Heard Matter or Constitute Special Bench.

The appeal arose from an order of the Chairman, Company Law Board (CLB) rejecting an application to transfer a partly-heard company petition from the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against DDA's Demand for Unearned Increase in Amalgamation Case. Amalgamation of Companies Under Court Order Does Not Amount to 'Transfer' Under Lease Deed Clause II(4)(a).

The appellant, M/s. Jaiprakash Industries Ltd. (now M/s. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.), was the transferee company resulting from the amalgamation of M/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Plea to Quash Impleadment of Company in SFIO Prosecution. Application Under Section 319 CrPC Allowed by Magistrate Challenged by Former Managing Director.

The petitioner, former Managing Director of Megacity (Bangalore) Developers and Builders Limited, filed criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...