Search Results for "presiding officer absence"

1020 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1020 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Petitioner's removal upheld as meeting complied with procedural requirements under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Rules.

The petitioner, Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talegaon Dashasar. On 05.12.2016, a no confidence motion was pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging School Tribunal Orders in Seniority and Appointment Dispute. Court Holds That Appointment of Head Mistress Was Valid and Seniority Must Be Determined by Education Inspector.

The judgment involves two writ petitions. Writ Petition No. 683 of 2002 was filed by Mrs. Pushpa Surendra Dhaktode challenging the School Tribunal's o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Order Reinstating Lecturer with 50% Backwages in Probation Termination Case. Termination of Probationary Lecturer Found Invalid as College Failed to Follow University Statute 422 for Assessment and Did Not Provide Opportunity to Show Cause.

The petitioners, the Principal and Chairman of Rizvi College of Arts, Science and Commerce, challenged the judgment and order dated 29 June 2001 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Vacancy of Panchayat Seat and Quo Warranto Against Panch. Petitioner Failed to Establish That Respondent No. 2 Was Disqualified Under Section 10(1)(c) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 for Having More Than Two Children.

The petitioner, Mr. Mansoor Mulla, a citizen and voter from Ward No. 9 of Curti, Ponda, Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...