Search Results for "pension rights"

440 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Dispute Under Industrial Disputes Act and Pension Fund Rules. Employee's Claim for Pension Failed Due to Insufficient Service and Voluntary Abandonment, Not Voluntary Retirement, Under Rule 22 of State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules, 1955.

The dispute arose from the appellant's claim for pensionary benefits after his service with the respondent bank ended. The appellant was appointed as ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Job Contract Pension Case — Sets Aside High Court Order Counting Entire Service for Pension. Only limited job-contract service sufficient to render eligibility for pension can be counted under Rule 18(6) of Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992.

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of appeals filed by the State of Odisha challenging the orders of the Orissa High Court that had dismissed the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by KPTCL Against Order Directing Disbursement of Pension to Retired Employee. Withholding of Pension Without Disciplinary Proceedings or Pension Rules is Arbitrary and Unjustified.

The case involves a retired employee of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) who superannuated on 31.05.2022. The Corporation with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IFCI's Appeal Against Retirees' Claim for Enhanced Pension Under VRS-2008. Voluntary Retirement Scheme's Full and Final Settlement Clause Bars Subsequent Claims for Pay Revision Benefits.

The dispute pertains to thirty-one employees of IFCI who voluntarily retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2008 (VRS-2008) on 1 February 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service

The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...