Search Results for "payee's bank account"

359 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 359 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Failure to Rebut Presumption. Appellant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as cheque was issued as security and loan transaction not reflected in income tax returns.

The appellant, Sri Dattatraya, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Sharanappa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act. The court confirmed that the accused's defence of a blank cheque was not credible and that the complainant had proved the existence of a legally enforceable debt.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, C. Niranjan Yadav, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted. Complainant's Failure to Prove Financial Capacity Does Not Automatically Discharge Accused When Execution of Cheque is Admitted.

The appellant/complainant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.12.2010 passed by the XV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to prove defence.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Sukhalal Kumar, against the acquittal of the accused, Prakash B. Borkar, under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Delayed Notice Beyond 30 Days Under Section 138 NI Act. Notice Posted on 31st Day from Bank Intimation Fails to Meet Mandatory Requirement of 'Giving Notice' Within 30 Days.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Shivnath Suryoba Gaonkar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant's claim of loan advanced to friend fails as no legally enforceable debt existed, leading to acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Shri Datta S. Nadkarni, filed a criminal appeal challenging the acquittal of the first respondent, Mr. Salvador Fernandes, from an offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to prove legally enforceable debt not established.

This is an appeal by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Appeal by Society in Cheque Dishonour Case for Failure to Prove Debt. Appellant Society Could Not Establish Outstanding Loan Amount After Auction of Pledged Goods, Resulting in Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Buldana Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Pyaru Saimulla Sheikh, for a...