Search Results for "order beyond notice"

9507 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9507 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to DRAT Order Upholding DRT Dismissal of Recall of Ex-Parte Decree in Debt Recovery Proceedings. Petitioners Contend Non-Service of Summons and Advocate's Mere Filing of Vakalatnama Cannot Waive Service, Which Is Essential for Written Statement.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.

This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Delhi High Court’s Unconditional Stay of Money Decree Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC. Execution of Trademark Infringement Money Decree Stayed Without Deposit Pending Appeal, Upheld by Apex Court Citing Sufficient Cause.

The dispute arose from a civil suit instituted by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and anor, claiming to be the proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Consent Order in Commercial Execution Application Arising from Arbitration Award; State Challenges Consent Terms Signed During President's Rule Under Article 356 of the Constitution

The dispute arose from a contract awarded on 6 July 2012 by the State of Maharashtra through its Public Works Department to Manaj Tollway Private Limi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Scope of Interference Under Section 37 Is Limited and Impugned Order Did Not Suffer From Patent Illegality or Perversity.

The petitioners, Wind World (India) Limited and others, filed an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Workman for Alleged Violation of Certified Standing Orders. Petition Raises Question Whether Inter-Unit Transfer is Permissible Under Standing Order Clause 7 and Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The petitioners, a Junior Section Officer employee (first petitioner) and a registered Trade Union (second petitioner), challenged an inter-unit trans...