Search Results for "mortgagor"

175 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that the appellant failed to prove the mortgage and refusal to redeem, and no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Gulabrao Vishwas Desai, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court against the judgment and order dated 3rd August 1988 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Borrower's Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order and Sale Proclamation Due to Alternative Remedy and Delay. Petitioner Failed to Appeal Under Section 30 of RDB Act, 1993 Against DRT Order Dated 14.3.2000, and Filed Writ After 13 Years.

The petitioner, A. Abdul Hameed, was a borrower who had taken a loan of Rs.5.00 lakh from Syndicate Bank (respondent No.1). Respondents No.3 and 4 had...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Tenant-Mortgagee Cannot Deny Landlord's Title. Court holds that a mortgage by a tenant in favour of the landlord is valid and the mortgagor's right to redeem subsists despite the mortgagee's acquisition of tenancy rights.

The suit property originally belonged to Arjun Nivrutti Darwade and his family. In 1939, the father of the appellants (original defendants) was induct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Seeking Priority Over Sales Tax Dues. Sales Tax Department's First Charge Under Section 38C of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Prevails Over Secured Creditor's Rights Under Securitisation Act, 2002.

The Thane Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. (the Bank) filed a writ petition challenging the action of the Sales Tax Department in attaching the property of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Sale Deed Challenged as Void for Non-Compliance with Section 7 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961, but Court Found No Substantial Question of Law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Navinchand Khushalchand Mutha against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in a suit for de...