CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
Search Results for "mistaken identity"
125 result(s) found
Found 125 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
7 Jul 2021The appellant, Tulshiram Balaji Pupalwad, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Shankar Venkat Papulwad. Th...
- 64
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Delivers Oral Judgment in Multiple Appeals. Trial Court Had Convicted Twenty Accused for Murder and Attempt to Murder Following Gram Panchayat Election Revenge Attack; Complainant and State Appealed Against Acquittals.
24 Jan 2011The case arose from an incident on 26th October 2005 at village Badegaon, Saoner, Nagpur, following Gram Panchayat elections. Two rival groups, the De...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.
8 Sep 2017The appellant, Sukumar Kallappa Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Sections 307 (attempt to murd...
- 241
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Criminal Appeals Concerning Dacoity Conviction Under IPC 395, 397 and Arms Act; Outcome Undetermined Due to Incomplete Text. The Court Analyzed Evidence on Identification, Recovery, and Acquittal Appeals but Final Decision Not Provided.
11 Jan 2019The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals arising from the same judgment and order dated 10th April 2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Date of Birth Dispute Resolved in Favour of Workman. The court held that the petitioner-hospital had resorted to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act by not accepting the corrected date of birth of the workman.
28 Apr 2006The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and a public trust under the administrative control of...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Gang Rape Case — Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration Lead to Upholding of Acquittal Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.
26 Jul 2017The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions ...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Procedural Defects. Conviction under Sections 363, 302, and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, was overturned as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on unreliable confession and lack of corroborative evidence.
25 Mar 2026The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 9th July 2024 by the Special Judge (POCSO), Thane, convicting the appellant under Sections 363, 302, ...
- 375
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC Upheld Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.
4 Apr 2014The petitioner, Domnic Luis, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in PC Act Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.
19 Nov 2019The appellant, Prakash Babulal Pardeshi, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nashik, in Special Case No.11 of 2012 for offences under Sections 7, 13(...
- 113
