Search Results for "minor irrigation"

297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Corrigendum in Public Works Contract — Arbitrary Modification of Eligibility Criteria Violates Article 14. Corrigendum altering experience requirement from 'similar work' to 'any work' held arbitrary and set aside.

The petitioner, Sri K.B. Kumar, a Grade I contractor, challenged a corrigendum dated 25.09.2024 issued by the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unfair Trial. Sanctioning Authority Not Examined and Contents of Sanction Order Not Proved, Rendering Conviction Unsustainable Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Devidas Jagannath Joshi, was convicted by the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Council Land Allotment. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Resolutions and Government Approval for Allotment of Land Reserved for Public Purposes Allegedly in Violation of Section 92 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

The writ petition, originally filed as a Public Interest Litigation, challenged the decisions of Baramati Municipal Council and the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Rejection for Non-Submission of 'Form B' Not Required by Tender Conditions. Court holds that rejection of bid was arbitrary and violative of Article 14, directing reconsideration of petitioner's bid.

The petitioner, M/s. Aditya Construction Company (J.V.), a joint venture partnership firm, challenged the rejection of its bid by the Vidarbha Irrigat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Case - Applications for Re-determination of Compensation Held Time-Barred. Limitation under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, not extended to claimants who failed to apply for certified copy of Court's award.

The acquiring body, the Executive Engineer of Jalna Minor Irrigation Division, filed writ petitions challenging awards passed under Section 28A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions for Higher Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Evidence. Petitioners failed to seek reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 within time and did not produce evidence of higher market value.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners from Poyanje, Panvel Taluka, Raigad District, challenging the compensation awarded for t...