Search Results for "mineral block"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "mineral block"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Liability for Supplementary Award Rests with Original Beneficiary, Not Transferee Company. Scheme of Arrangement Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 Does Not Transfer Contingent Liabilities of Pending Acquisition Proceedings.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. against the order of the Himachal Pradesh High Court dated 12.07.2022. The Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of SVLDRS Application for Service Tax Dispute. The court held that a VCES declaration that was not filed within the prescribed time and not processed does not constitute a 'voluntary disclosure' under Section 125(1)(e) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019, thus the petitioner is eligible for the Sabka Vishwas Scheme.

21 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Deelight Fortune Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had given its commercial premises on leave and...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Entry Tax Case — Lubricants Not 'Petroleum Products' Under Karnataka Entry Tax Act. Synthetic and petroleum-based lubricants imported under Customs Tariff Chapters 34 and 37 are not covered by the definition of 'petroleum products' in Section 2(6) of the Karnataka Entry Tax Act, 1979, and thus not liable to entry tax.

16 Dec 2020

The appellant, M/s. Kluber Lubrication (India) Pvt Ltd, a private limited company registered as a dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Clause 27.4 of Agreement Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, but Third Party Respondent No.5 Cannot Be Referred to Arbitration.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 27.4 Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, Third Party Not Bound. The court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 4 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but dismissed the petition against respondent No.5 who was not a party to the agreement.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT Dispute — Inter-State Sale of Rough Granite Blocks Not Proven as Export Sale. Assessee failed to discharge burden of proof under Section 5(1) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

6 Jul 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging E-Auction of Sand Ghats — Time-Limited Auction Process Upheld as Valid. Court holds that introduction of time limit in e-auction is not arbitrary and that disconnection of internet link does not vitiate auction when petitioner failed to report promptly.

16 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Arunodaya Magaswargiya Mazdoor Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., a labour cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularisation of Temporary Employees in MSEDCL — Project-Based Workers Not Entitled to Regularisation. Temporary employees engaged for electrification of tribal hamlets under Maharashtra State Electricity Board held not entitled to regularisation as their employment was co-terminus with the project and not against sanctioned posts.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, a group of temporary employees, were engaged as electricians and wiremen by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) for a spec...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)