Search Results for "mill test certificate"

112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Oral Sex on Minor Set Aside as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Mother's Testimony.

The appellant, Rahul Shingade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in POCSO Case No.1/2015 for offences under Section 376(2)(i)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces on MSEDCL's Challenge to Order Permitting Single Point Supply to Condominium Under Section 127 Electricity Act. Appellate Authority Allowed Developer to Supply Electricity to Unit Holders through HT Connection Without Individual Connections.

The dispute pertains to the legality of single point electricity supply to a condominium complex known as Great Eastern Plaza in Pune. The petitioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in KVAT Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 70(2)(a) Cannot Be Imposed Without Specific Finding of Mens Rea or Fraudulent Intent. Revisional Authority's Restoration of Penalty Set Aside as Assessee Had Disclosed Purchases in Returns and Paid Tax.

The case involves an appeal filed by M/s Bhavani Enterprises, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, against an order of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Classification of Electrical Insulated Press Board Under Third Schedule of KVAT Act, 2003. Assessee's Claim for Lower Tax Rate as 'Paper' is Examined Under Common Parlance and Trade Parlance Tests.

The assessee, a registered dealer under the CST Act and KVAT Act, manufactured and sold Electrical Insulated Press Board (High Density Board) used in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal, Holds Managing Agents' Group Controlling Over 75% Voting Power Excludes Company from 'Public Interest' Under Section 23A. Partners of Managing Agency Forming a Controlling Group Cannot Be Counted as Public for Purposes of Exemption Under Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, concerning the applicability of Section 23A to a company where the Income-tax Officer sought ...