High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging the Constitutionality of Maharashtra Act IX of 2017. Petitioners Contend that Multi-Member Wards and Direct Election of President Violate Article 243R and Equality Clauses.
28 Sep 2018...
Search Results for "metropolitan area"
713 result(s) found
Found 713 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.
15 Jun 2026The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines
8 Apr 2026The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Power Project Under MID Act and Rehabilitation Act — Acquisition Held Valid for Public Purpose of Augmenting Power Supply. The court upheld the notifications under Sections 32 and 33 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and Sections 11, 13, 14 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 for acquisition of agricultural land for a 1600 MW coastal power plant.
4 Apr 2012The petitioners, residents of Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their agricultural lands for a 1600 MW Coastal Power Plant...
- 149
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Domestic Violence Case — Jurisdiction of Magistrate Upheld. The court held that the V ACMM, Traffic Court, Bangalore had jurisdiction to entertain a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, as the respondent-wife resided within its territorial limits.
20 Sep 2019The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by K.C. Vijayakumara and K.C. Basavaraj (petitioners) against Smt. S. Geetha (respondent). The pe...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Against Kolkata Magistrate Under Article 226 Based on Cause of Action Arising in Maharashtra. The court held that the High Court can exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 if the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises within its territorial limits, even if the seat of the authority is outside those limits.
11 Mar 2021The petitioners, Bhajan S/o Jagu Malkam and Patiram S/o Zigu Hichami, residents of Gadchiroli, Maharashtra, filed a Criminal Writ Petition No. 352/202...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Prosecution of Appellant in Trade Licence Case Due to Lack of District Board's Jurisdiction Over Town Areas. District Board's Power to Regulate Offensive Trades Under U.P. District Boards Act, 1922 Held Inapplicable to Town Areas Given Concurrent Authority Under U.P. Town Areas Act, 1914.
3 Dec 1958The case involved a prosecution initiated by the District Board of Muzaffarnagar against the appellant, Asa Ram, for running machines with the aid of ...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses CBI Petition Challenging Remand of Case to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in Pardon Tender Dispute. ACMM Not Equivalent to CMM Under Section 306 CrPC, Committal Order Invalid.
1 Jul 2011The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a charge-sheet against eight accused for offences under Section 120-B read with Sections 420, 468, 471...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
6 Feb 2015The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...
- 81
High Court
- 52
