ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "materially affected"
389 result(s) found
Found 389 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Leave India Notice by Australian Employee over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and FRRO's Jurisdiction. Employment Visa Grant by High Commission Not Subject to FRRO's Nullification, Argues Petitioner.
9 Feb 2026The writ petition was filed by an Australian citizen, who held an Employment Visa (E-2) valid from 08.01.2018 to 07.01.2020, after being appointed as ...
- 23
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Returned Candidate in Karnataka Legislative Council Election Dispute — Nominated Members' Voting Rights Upheld. The Court held that nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 are entitled to vote, reversing the High Court's decision that had set aside the election.
1 Jan 2026The case pertains to the election to the Karnataka Legislative Council from the 12-Chikkamagaluru Local Authorities Constituency held in 2021. The con...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Application for Rejection of Election Petition Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Matter Involves Scrutiny of Whether Election Petition Discloses Cause of Action and Complies with Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
9 May 2025Background: The present application arose from an election petition challenging the biennial election to the Maharashtra Legislative Council from the ...
- 34
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 902
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in Election Petition — Application Filed After Issues Framed Held to Be Delaying Tactic. The court upheld the trial court's order imposing costs for protracting the election petition.
15 Dec 2021The petitioner, Prakash Devji More, was elected as a Councillor of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on 23/02/2017. The respondent No...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bye-Election to Fill Casual Vacancy in Katol Assembly Constituency. Section 151A of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Mandates Filling Casual Vacancy Within Six Months, and the Election Schedule Complies with the Statutory Time Limit.
12 Apr 2019The petitioner, Sandeep Yashwantrao Sarode, Chairman of Panchayat Samiti, Katol, and Director of Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol, filed a ...
- 142
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Election Petition Orders in Municipal Election Disputes — Upholds Setting Aside of Election Results for Non-Compliance with Model Code of Conduct. Court holds that violation of election rules and corrupt practices invalidate election of candidates under Section 27 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.
19 Jun 2015The judgment arises from two appeals (M.F.A.No.3888/2014 and M.F.A.No.3889/2014) filed under Section 27 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, aga...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Section 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Failure to Furnish Material Facts and Full Particulars of Alleged Corrupt Practices Renders Petition Liable for Summary Dismissal.
10 Mar 2010The petitioner, Dr. Kirit Jayantilal Somaiya, filed an election petition challenging the election of respondent No.1, Sanjay Dina Patil, from the Mumb...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bar Council Elections and Advocate Enrollment Rules. Court upholds Bar Council of India's power to prescribe enrollment conditions under Section 49 of Advocates Act, 1961 and rejects challenge to election process for lack of merit.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Manubhai Paragji Vashi, an advocate aged about 79 years, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election p...
- 78
