Search Results for "jurisdictional overreach"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in IPC Forgery Case Due to Material Suppression and Witness Intimidation -- Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Bail Order Upheld as Accused Concealed Multiple FIRs and Abused Liberty

The Supreme Court heard a criminal appeal against the High Court's order granting bail to Respondent No. 2 in an FIR involving offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat Election Process for Non-Compliance with Pre-Election Deposit Requirement. Petitioners failed to deposit required amount under Rule 7(2) of Maharashtra Gram Panchayat (Election) Rules, 2014, leading to rejection of nomination papers.

The petitioners, residents of Khuneshwar village in Solapur district, filed two writ petitions challenging the election process for the Gram Panchayat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs Police to Register FIR in Partnership Dispute Case Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Writ Petition Allowed

The petitioner, filed a writ petition seeking direction to the police to register an FIR based on his complaint dated 29.09.2025 alleging various offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father for Custody of Minor Daughter from Mother — Custody Dispute Between Parents Not Maintainable as Habeas Corpus When Child is in Mother's Custody and Not Illegally Detained.

The petitioner, Gaurav Raj Jain, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...