Search Results for "incorrect statement"

2993 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2993 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Articles. Accused's Guilt Established Through Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Stolen Property Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, a labourer working at the farmhouse of Mr. Jose Kafan (deceased), was convicted by the High Court of Karnataka for the murder of the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Matter to Chief Justice on Advocates' Misconduct in Vexatious SLP Filing. Advocates Filed Second SLP with Incorrect Statements After Dismissal of First, Tendered Unconditional Apology, Leading to Divergent Judicial Opinions Under Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The Supreme Court was confronted with a case involving misconduct by advocates in filing a vexatious special leave petition. The petitioner, convicted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ICICI Bank's Intervention Application in Winding-Up Petition. ICICI Bank's claim not yet due and it is otherwise sufficiently secured; application held premature and aimed at defeating resolution of BNYM's claim.

The applicant, ICICI Bank Limited, sought to be impleaded as a respondent or alternatively to intervene in a company application filed by The Bank of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Sales Tax Case Due to Lack of Reasonable Belief — Reopening Based on Mere Suspicion and Incomplete Information Held Invalid Under Section 35 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and Rule 9A of Central Sales Tax (Bombay) Rules, 1957.

The petitioners, Shree Venkateshwara Petro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Revenue Appeal on Deletion of Additions for Bogus Transportation, Illegal Mining, and Helicopter Expenses. The Court Examines Whether the ITAT's Deletions Were Perverse and Whether Cross-Examination Rights Were Adequately Protected Under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal before the Karnataka High Court arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru, which partly allowed the assess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal's Order Upheld for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged concealment of income was deleted by the Tribunal on finding no deliberate concealment.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...