Search Results for "illegal dispossession"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that the second appellate court cannot re-appreciate evidence unless there is a perverse finding or substantial question of law under Section 100 of CPC.

The appellant, who was the defendant in the original suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Favor of Tenant in Land Dispute with Agricultural Corporation. The court restored the trial court's interim injunction protecting the petitioner's possession based on prima facie tenancy rights and balance of convenience.

The petitioner, Baliram Dagadu Mundfane, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Possession Based on Prior Possession. The court held that the appellant had established prior possession and dispossession without consent, entitling her to a decree for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Cian De Souza, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking vacation and peaceful possession of Flat No.4, Ha...