Search Results for "hymen tear"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 376, 323, 506, 343 IPC and Section 3(1)(xi) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Sadashiv Rahate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Khamgaon in Special Atrocity Case No.3/2011 for offences under Sections 376...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant-accused, Arvindbhai @ Bhadabhai Shanabhai @ Shankarbhai Chauhan, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Child Witness Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 4, 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Balaji Sarjerao Kamble, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for the rape of a 7-year-old girl under Section 376 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vishal Ramesh Bhalerao, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 826 of 2012 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Ganesh Uke, was convicted by the 6th Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial 62/2002 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecution Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Soma Balkrushna Dadore, was convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376 IPC (rape) and Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Contradictions in Testimony of Wife and Daughter Create Reasonable Doubt Under Section 376 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Anwar Shamim Shaikh, the respondent-accused, who was charged with rape under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Damodhar Rambhau Inchal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 102 of 2008 for offences under...