Search Results for "government condonation"

701 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 701 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Application to Condoned Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. The court held that mere administrative delay without explanation for each day does not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Gujarat, through the Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Application to Condoned 2386-Day Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal. Government's Internal File Movement Not Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, Godhra, and others (the State) filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Court holds that failure to pay costs as directed by the court results in dismissal of the appeal under Section 100 CPC.

The State of Karnataka and its officers filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MRT Order Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Tenancy Appeal. Delay of 30 Years in Filing Appeal Not Condoned as No Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased original tenants, challenged the judgment and order dated 12/11/2021 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Revision for Non-Deposit of 50% Dues. Pre-deposit under Section 154(2A) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 not required for considering condonation of delay application.

The petitioner, Mr. Dilawar Hakim Shah, challenged an order dated 22.2.2005 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Konkan D...