Search Results for "first informant"

2386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of valid demand notice is a prerequisite for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves two criminal applications filed by the applicants (original accused) seeking quashing of FIR No. 0033 of 2018 and connected proceedi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Stalking and Assault Case Due to Compromise Between Relatives. Court holds that when parties have settled their differences and the complainant is no longer interested in prosecuting, continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicants, Vijaykumar Dinkar Sirsat, Akshay Dinkar Sirsat, Dinkar Shankar Sirsat, and Satyabhama Dinkar Sirsat, filed a criminal application unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Complainant Failed to Prove That Accused Forged Documents or Cheated Him in Plot Sale Transaction Under Sections 420, 468, 471, 109 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the original informant, Sharad Bonde, and an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Summon Defence Witness in Rape and Cruelty Case — Rejection of Summons Application Set Aside as Premature. The court held that the accused has a right to lead defence evidence under Section 233 CrPC and the trial court must consider such applications on merits.

The petitioners, who are accused in Sessions Case No.182 of 2013 pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, challenged an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as identification of helmeted assailant at night was doubtful and circumstantial evidence insufficient.

The appellant, Mayuresh Ajit Gambhir, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Sachin Suresh Tavde on 13 Augus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in Robbery Case — FIR Discloses Prima Facie Offences Under Sections 394, 336, 506 IPC. Counterblast Allegation Insufficient to Quash FIR When Specific Overt Acts Are Alleged.

The applicants, Chatrabhuj Dadarao Shinde and Shivaji Chatrabhuj Shinde, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of seven appellants by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 70 of 1988. The a...