Search Results for "export duty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "export duty"

807 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 807 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Interest is Leviable on Additional Duty of Customs and Settlement Commission's Power to Rectify Errors. The Court Scrutinised the Legality of Imposing Interest on Counter Veiling Duty Where Modvat Credit Was Available and Considered Whether Tribunals Have Inherent Jurisdiction to Correct Accidental Mistakes Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.

27 Apr 2005

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a public limited company engaged in manufacturing automotive furnishing fabrics, challenging the order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST Paid on Exported Goods Despite Claim of Higher Drawback Rate. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST under Section 16(3)(b) of IGST Act read with Section 54 of CGST Act and Rule 96 of CGST Rules, as selection of higher drawback column does not disentitle refund.

26 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Kunal Housewares Private Limited, exported stainless steel household articles in July, August, and September 2017. The petitioner paid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case: Commissioner's Decision on Nil Duty Binding on Assessing Officer. Duty on DTA Clearances of Fresh Mushrooms by 100% EOU Held Nil Following Commissioner's Order Under Section 3(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

14 Dec 2012

The appellant, ECO Valley Farms & Foods Limited, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in cultivation, manufacture, and export of fresh/processed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Job Work Definition and Value Addition Clause Interpreted. Tribunal's finding that activity amounted to job work and value addition clause does not exclude indigenous material value set aside.

31 Oct 2012

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai filed an appeal under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order dated 6th June, 2006 of th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay allows importer's writ petition challenging Settlement Commission order that failed to apply lowest transaction value rule for identical goods under Customs Valuation Rules; directs reduction of duty demand from Rs.23,01,077 to Rs.3 lakhs. Court holds that Settlement Commission is bound by the Customs Act and Valuation Rules, and must adopt the lowest of multiple identical goods' transaction values when available.

27 Jul 2010

The dispute arose from imports of electronic goods by the petitioner during 1995-96. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence investigated alleged unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Customs Duty Payable on Redemption of Confiscated Goods Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 — Interest Under Section 28AB Also Attracts. Redemption fine does not substitute duty; duty and interest are separate liabilities.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court adjudicated two questions arising under the Customs Act, 1962: whether customs duty is payable when confiscated goods are redeemed a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claim of Dealer in Central Excise Case — Revenue's Revision Rejected for Ignoring Evidence. Dealer entitled to rebate under Rule 12(1)(a) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 35EE of Central Excise Act, 1944 when duty paid to manufacturer and not passed on to exporter.

10 Aug 2010

The Petitioners, M/s. Madhav Steel (a partnership firm) and its partner R.J. Virwadia, filed a writ petition challenging the Order dated 29th May 2006...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of CVD Paid on Imported Mobile Phones Under Exemption Notification. The court held that the exemption notification No.12/2012-Customs applies to imports and directed reconsideration of refund claims subject to verification of unjust enrichment.

30 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Micromax Informatics Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, imported mobile handsets during July 2014 to June 2015 and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demurrage and Wharfage Charges by Port Trust — Holds Customs Detention Not Attributable to Exporter for Demurrage Liability. The court quashed the demand for demurrage and wharfage charges against the exporter and directed the Customs authorities to pay the amount to the Port Trust.

29 Mar 2006

The petitioners, Vidyt Metallics Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging the orders dated 17.12.1998 and 29.12.1998 and the demand dated 8...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)