High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "exhaustive provisions"
1715 result(s) found
Found 1715 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Caste Validity Suit — Limitation Period Under Article 58 Not Applicable as Suit Sought Consequential Relief. Suit for Declaration and Setting Aside of Scrutiny Committee Order Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, and Filed Within Time.
8 Apr 2019The appellant, Gulab Ayubkhan Pathan, filed a suit (Special Civil Suit No.5 of 2017) before the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, seekin...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Enforcement Committee Decision in Textile Quota Fraud Case. Petitioner Found to Have Forged Visas and Fabricated Bank Realisation Certificates to Obtain Premium Quota.
4 Oct 2011The petitioner, M/s. Minar Exports, challenged a decision of the Enforcement Committee constituted under a notification dated 12 November 1999 by the ...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Non-Certification of Annexures to Return of Allotment Under Section 39(5) of Companies Act, 2013 — Default Under Section 39(4) Relates Only to Filing of Return, Not Certification of Annexures.
27 Apr 2026The petitioners, N.S.J.L Nidhi Ltd and its officers, challenged an order dated October 11, 2023, by which a Learned Adjudicating Officer imposed a pen...
- 132
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Quashing of FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court Held That a Preliminary Inquiry Is Not Mandatory Before FIR Registration and the FIR Should Not Be Quashed as It Discloses a Cognizable Offence Based on Source Information.
8 Oct 2021The appeal arose from a judgment of the Telangana High Court dated 11 February 2020, which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondents under Arti...
- 348
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demand Notices Under Mathadi Act — Unprotected Worker Defined as Manual Worker in Scheduled Employment. Direct Employment Does Not Exclude Coverage Under Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969.
3 Mar 2006The Bombay High Court addressed two writ petitions challenging demand notices issued under the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Re...
- 122
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtors' Writ Petitions Challenging Attachment in Execution of Foreign Decree. Court Holds That Objections Under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC Must Be Raised Before Executing Court, Not by Writ Petition.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by judgment debtors challenging the attachment of their property in execution of a foreign decree. T...
- 120
