Search Results for "excess pay recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "excess pay recovery"

841 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 841 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay; Recovery Set Aside as Impermissible Under Rafiq Masih Principles Despite Confirmed Pay Revision. Court Holds That Recovery from a Group C Employee After More Than Five Years, in Absence of Misrepresentation, Constitutes Hardship and Falls Within Impermissible Categories Enumerated in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

20 Jul 2026

The petitioner, V. Thangadurai, was working as a Translator under the second respondent, the Principal District Judge, Kallakurichi, and later promote...

High Court

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Quashing Recovery of Excess Pay from Government Employee; Holds Recovery After Long Delay Without Misrepresentation Impermissible Under Rafiq Masih Principles, Confirms Pay Revision and Directs Refund of Amount Recovered.

10 Jul 2026

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by D. Sivakumar, a government employee working as Central Naz...

High Court

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Steno-Typist. Recovery Set Aside on Grounds of Hardship as Employee Belonged to Group C Service, Excess Payment Exceeded Five Years, and No Misrepresentation Found, Following State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

2 Jul 2026

The dispute arose when the petitioner, K. Amutha, a Steno-Typist serving in the judicial department of the State of Tamil Nadu, was confronted with a ...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Recovery Order Against Retired Teacher -- Pensionary Benefits Ordered to Be Released Under Article 226 and Supreme Court Guidelines

17 Feb 2026

The petitioner, a retired teacher, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash an order dated 08.06.2007 that direct...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Against Retired Employee in Service Pay Excess Case — Recovery Impermissible When Not Due to Employee's Fault. Recovery of Excess Pay from Terminal Benefits of Retired Employee Declared Illegal Under Article 226; Amount Already Deducted Ordered to Be Refunded with 6% Interest.

6 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a retired employee of Anna University, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a recovery order dated 16.07.2019 and seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Teacher's Petition, Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Gratuity — Recovery Held Invalid as No Fraud or Misrepresentation by Employee. Excess payment due to employer's mistake in pay fixation under Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009 cannot be recovered from retiral benefits after retirement.

7 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Ashok Buchayya Pusalwar, was an Assistant Teacher employed by the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, appointed on 24-10-1996. He voluntarily ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Improper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the plaintiff bank failed to prove the debt and liability of the defendant, and the notice under Section 138 was not properly served, thus the suit for recovery was not maintainable.

30 Aug 2019

The appellant, K. Ravindra Shetty, was the defendant in a suit filed by Vijaya Bank for recovery of Rs. 3,20,835.20 with interest. The bank claimed th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension and Recovery of Excess Payment. Employer's Order Reducing Pay Fixed at Retirement and Recovering Excess Amount Set Aside as Violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Unreasonable.

17 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Vijay Sambrao Bharati, a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged an order of his employer that reduced the pay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Alleged Excess Payments from D.Ed College Employees — Recovery Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Refixation of Pay Scale and Grade Pay Set Aside as Unilateral and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

16 Apr 2018

The judgment concerns a group of nine writ petitions filed by employees of D.Ed colleges in Maharashtra, challenging the recovery of amounts allegedly...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Importing Customs Recovery Provisions for Excise Duty Interest. Section 12 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Validly Empowers Application of Customs Act Recovery Mechanisms for Interest on Delayed Payment of Excise Duty.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Krishnakant Sakharam Ghag, a partner of M/s Amit Textile Processors, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the va...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)