Search Results for "excess attachment"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Passes Order in Writ Petition Challenging Provisional Attachment. The Company's Bank Accounts Attached Under Unspecified Statute Were Under Challenge, and Rule Was Made Returnable Immediately.

The petitioner, Serenity Trades Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a provisional attachment notice dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Recovery Order in Contract Dispute — Unilateral Recovery Without Notice Violates Natural Justice. Petitioner's dues cannot be withheld without prior notice and opportunity of hearing under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Michigan Engineers Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure and construction services, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Notice of Motion for Contempt in Property Dispute. Consent order allowing repairs and maintenance did not prohibit fixing of tiles on terrace, and society's actions were not in breach of the order.

The petitioner, M/s. Chetan Associates, a partnership firm, filed a suit against the respondent, Abhilasha Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd., seeking injunctive r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Unearned Income Demand Without Proper Calculation. Collector's report lacked detailed calculation and was set aside; matter remanded for fresh consideration with opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Makhanlal S/o Jagannath Agrawal, purchased Class-2 land under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code by a sale deed dated 25/9/1998. The or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...