Search Results for "employer's mistake"

193 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 193 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employees Against Recovery Orders in Service Law Case Due to Lack of Hearing and Erroneous Employer Interpretation. Recovery of Excess Payments After Retirement Held Illegal as No Misrepresentation by Employees and Based on Equity Principles to Prevent Hardship.

The dispute involved retired stenographers who had been granted financial benefits in 2017 based on the Shetty Commission recommendations, which were ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints Against Newspaper Publisher for Lack of Vicarious Liability Under Negotiable Instruments Act. Publisher Not Liable for Dishonour of Cheques Issued by Employees Without Authorisation.

The petitioner, Lokmat Media Private Limited, a newspaper publishing company, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not re-agitating merits.

The case pertains to a review petition filed by M/s National Textile Corporation Ltd. and another (the original respondents) seeking review of a judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award for Water Supply Scheme. Court sets aside award to Respondent No.5 and directs fresh evaluation of petitioner's bid as per tender conditions.

The petitioner, Jain Irrigation Systems Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act and engaged in manufacturing plastic pipes and executi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notice Against Employee. Recovery of Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Employer's Mistake Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Quashing of Recovery Notice. Employer Cannot Recover Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Its Own Mistake in Granting Exemption from Departmental Examination.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notices for Excess Wages Paid to Employees. Recovery of wages paid under mistake of law held impermissible without prior notice and opportunity of hearing.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30/09/2005 passed by the Industrial Court, L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Employee by MSRTC — Violation of Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination without notice or compensation held illegal and set aside.

The petitioner, M.A. Azim, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) from 3 June 1968 and was promoted to ...