Search Results for "employees provident fund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "employees provident fund"

585 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes EPF Recovery Orders Against Closed Cooperative Society — No Employees, No Liability Under EPF Act. Ginning Factory Closed Since 2003 with Disconnected Electricity Supply; Impugned Orders for Period After Closure Set Aside.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Utkarsha Vividha Karyakari Sahakari Society, a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, r...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Urban Malaria Department Employees of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation — Employees Held Entitled to Pensionary Benefits Under BPMC Pension Rules Despite Being on Contract Basis

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, employees of the Urban Malaria Department of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Const...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of SSD Fund Employees for Pensionary Benefits Under 6th CPC — Holds That Long-Term Employment with Government Control and Parity with Regular Employees Confers Status of Government Servants. The Court found that denial of benefits to SSD Fund staff while granting them to other SFF personnel performing similar duties violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

21 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by six employees (Rajkaran Singh, Jagat Ram Joshi, Vishu Dutt Tripathi, HK Naithani, Shiv Kumar, and Surat ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Remands EPF Coverage Dispute for Pigmy Agents to Provident Fund Commissioner for Enquiry Under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The court held that the determination of whether a pigmy agent is an 'employee' under Section 2(f) requires a factual enquiry, and set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order.

7 Jul 2022

The Central Board of Trustees and other petitioners challenged an order dated 29.08.2005 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Under Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS). Resignation Submitted Under MVRS Was Unconditional and Could Not Be Withdrawn After Acceptance, as Per Scheme Terms Under Clause 5.1.

27 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the respondent's resignation under the Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS) introduced by the appellants, a public secto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging EPF Liability Assessment Under Section 7A of EPF Act — Upholds Tribunal's Order Confirming Recovery of Rs. 67,67,178 for Non-Production of Records. The court held that when an establishment fails to produce records despite repeated opportunities, the authorities are justified in making a best judgment assessment based on available material.

11 Dec 2018

The petitioner, M/s Vardhaman Construction, a proprietary concern engaged in government construction contracts, challenged an order dated 15-12-2016 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officials in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors/Officers Not Liable for Offences Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Specific Allegations of Role in Transaction.

8 Mar 2016

The case involves three criminal writ petitions filed by directors and officers of the Sangli District Primary Teachers Co-operative Bank Ltd. seeking...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Provident Fund Damages for Delayed Remittance. Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Imposes Strict Liability Without Requiring Mens Rea.

21 Sep 2015

The petitioner, M/s HMT Limited, a Central Public Sector Enterprise, challenged the order dated 2.1.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commiss...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Challenge to EPF Damages Order — Delay and Lack of Jurisdictional Error. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any error in the order imposing damages under Section 14-B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.

18 Sep 2013

The petitioner, M/s Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd, challenged an order dated 19.05.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner imposing damage...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets 'Setting Up' of Establishment Under Section 16(1)(b) of Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952, Determining Whether Change of Ownership Creates New Establishment for Exemption Purposes. The Court Clarified the Test for Fresh Exemption Period When an Existing Business is Transferred to a New Owner.

17 Sep 1969

...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)