WRIT PETITION NO.730 OF 2009
14 Jul 2011The four writ petitions arose from income tax assessment proceedings concerning the transfer of shares of Idea Cellular Limited (formerly Birla Commun...
Search Results for "double benefits"
393 result(s) found
Found 393 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Partly Allows CIDCO's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000/- per Hectare Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land. The court reduced the compensation from Rs. 2,00,000/- to Rs. 1,50,000/- per hectare, applying a 20% deduction for development charges, and upheld the claimants' entitlement to statutory benefits under Sections 23 and 24 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
26 Feb 2020The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding. The appellant in First Appeal No. 5206 of 2017 is the Administrator of...
- 75
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Challenging Enhanced Compensation for Railway Project Lands. Market Value Determination at Rs.39,20,400 per Acre by Reference Courts Contested as Inadequate by Landowners and Excessive by Railways.
24 Sep 2020These appeals and cross-objections arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State for the South Central Railway in Mahagaon village, K...
- 65
High Court
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.626 OF 2010
12 Aug 2010The assessee, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2002-03 declaring a loss of Rs. 45.90 crores and claimed a...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deduction of Insurance Premium from Compensation Set Aside. Claimants entitled to full compensation without deduction of premium paid by employer under group insurance scheme.
4 Mar 2021The claimants, mother, father, and brother of the deceased Sagar N, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the ...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disabled Employee Against Private Company for Violation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Employer Directed to Re-Employ or Pay Compensation for Hearing Loss Acquired Due to Unsafe Work Environment.
23 Dec 2005The petitioner, Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye, a person with hearing disability, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...
- 86
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Sections 23(5) of Income Tax Act, 1922 and 297(2)(g) and 271(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Against Double Taxation and Article 14 Challenges. Registered Firm’s Appeal Dismissed; Provisions on Double Taxation of Firm and Partners and Penalty Classification Held Valid.
18 Nov 1969The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by a registered firm and its partners challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Company's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal Award on Wage Revision and Dearness Allowance for Daily Rated Workmen — Settlement Reached During Pendency of Petition. The court directed the company to pay double the amount every month from 1.4.1991 based on a settlement between the parties.
6 May 2005The petitioner, Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd., a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, with factories at Mumbai and Thane,...
- 136
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Aurangabad Bench Partially Allows Appeal Against Quantum of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim; Ex Gratia Payment Deducted to Prevent Double Benefit. Court Modifies Non-Pecuniary Damages Awarded by Tribunal Conforming to Supreme Court Guidelines in Pranay Sethi, Reducing Compensation by Rs.10 Lakh Ex Gratia Payment and Adjusting Consortium and Funeral Expenses.
29 Jul 2019The present appeal arose from the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar in MACP No. 407 of 2012, whereby the claim peti...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.
4 May 2018These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...
- 61
