Search Results for "demand and acceptance"

1866 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1866 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Minimum Wages Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence on Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. State fails to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Buldana, appealed against the judgment and order dated 28/06/2000 passed by the Learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Wamanrao Pawar, a Head Constable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Special Case No. 3 of 1989 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Forest Guard in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Khudaram Kshirsagar, a Forest Guard, who was charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yashwant Sambhaji Dadmal, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.6 of 1999 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Yavatmal, appealed against the judgment and order dated 24/01/2002 passed by the learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Rs. 800 Bribe Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Dnyanoba Wamanrao Jadhav, a Talathi, who was charged under the Prevention of Corrupt...