Search Results for "defence representative"

502 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 502 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The petitioner, Mahesh, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC challenging the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Bailhongal, dated 24.01...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Appeal by Society in Cheque Dishonour Case for Failure to Prove Debt. Appellant Society Could Not Establish Outstanding Loan Amount After Auction of Pledged Goods, Resulting in Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Buldana Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Pyaru Saimulla Sheikh, for a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Company and Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Directors' Claim of Not Being In Charge of Business at Time of Cheque Issuance Fails to Rebut Presumption of Liability Under Section 141.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s. Jaimin Jewelery Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Accused No.1) and its directors, Gautam Mehta (Accu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Bank Officer in State Bank of India Disciplinary Case. Penalty of Removal from Service under Rule 67(i) of State Bank of India Officers Service Rules Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Charges of Irregularities as Branch Manager.

The petitioner, Gopal Vajani, was employed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) since 1978, rising from Clerk-cum-typist to Scale-III officer. He was...