Search Results for "deemed lapse"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "deemed lapse"

729 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 729 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Non-Compliance with Award or Possession Requirements.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Ramchandra Jamnadas Sadriwala, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court seeking a declaration that the land acquisition pro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Collector's Appeal Against Lapse Declaration in Land Acquisition Case. Acquisition Upheld as Physical Possession Was Taken, Overruling Pune Municipal Corporation Based on Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

19 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the Land Acquisition Collector appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Not Deemed Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Even Though Compensation Was Not Paid.

20 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. The High Court had allowe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. High Court's reliance on overruled Pune Municipal Corporation precedent was erroneous as possession had been taken, negating lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

20 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 13.02.2017 in Writ Petition (C) No. 8685 of 2015, which allowed a writ petition file...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. The Court held that acquisition proceedings did not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as possession was taken, and the writ petitioner lacked locus standi due to unproven title.

20 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi, which allowed a writ petition and declared that land acquisition proceedings under the La...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case, Reversing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Satisfying Only One of Twin Conditions Required for Deemed Lapse.

20 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority against a judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that land acquisiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA and Govt. of NCT of Delhi Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Not Deemed Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Act, 2013 When Possession Taken but Compensation Not Paid. Possession Taken on 26.05.1998 Vests Land in State; No Divesting Under Section 24(2) as per Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal.

15 Dec 2022

The case involves appeals by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment of the Delhi High Court. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government of NCT of Delhi's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside Due to Pendency of Proceedings Initiated by Landowners. The Court held that when possession could not be taken due to court orders obtained by landowners, the period of interim orders is excluded in computing five years for lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the High Court of Delhi's judgment in Writ Petition (C) No. 2709 of 2015, which declared that land acq...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court's reliance on overruled Pune Municipal Corporation decision renders declaration of lapse unsustainable.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi and another appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition proceedings conce...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

27 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)