Search Results for "deceptively similar mark"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trade Mark Infringement Case — Continuous Prior Use Not Established by Respondent. Section 34 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 requires continuous use from a date prior to registration; gap in evidence of use after 2013 defeats claim of prior user.

The appellant, Leben Life Science Private Limited, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, Jarun Pharmaceuticals Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'HOTEL SPECIAL' vs 'SVT HOTEL SPECIAL' for Asafoetida. Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Addition of Prefix 'SVT'.

The appellant/defendant, S.V.T Products, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S. No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'SUPER MOR CHHAP' Held Deceptively Similar to 'MOR CHHAP'. Registration and Prior Use of 'MOR CHHAP' for Lime Plaster Entitled Plaintiff to Protection Under Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal, filed a suit for trade mark infringement against the defendant, Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi, alleging that the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Despite Defendant's Preliminary Objections. Plaintiff's Mark 'ESSEL' Found to Have Acquired Distinctiveness and Defendant's Use Likely to Cause Confusion.

The plaintiff, Essel Propack Ltd., filed a suit in 2010 against Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and another defendant for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Defendant in Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles for Country Liquor Constitutes Infringement of Registered Mark 'TANGO PUNCH' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited, and the defendant, South Konkan Distilleries, both manufacture and sell country liquor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement in Favor of Plaintiff. Passing Off Claim Deferred Due to Pending Rectification Proceedings Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, Hem Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals (erstwhile partners of a firm), filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad. The court found that the marks 'MERELANE' and 'MARICELL' are deceptively similar and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'MARICELL'.

The appellant, Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for infringement of its registered trademark 'MERELANE' and for passing off against the res...