Search Results for "coparceners"

251 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 251 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holds Suit Bad for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. All co-sharers and co-partners are necessary parties in a suit for partition and possession; failure to join them renders the suit liable to dismissal.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and possession of agricultural land. The respondents (plaintiffs) filed the suit a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Operates Retrospectively. The Correctness of the Division Bench Decision in Vaishali Satish Ganorkar Holding Prospective Operation is Challenged, with Parties Citing Supreme Court Precedents.

This matter comprises a batch of second appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, presided over by Justice R.G. Ketkar. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit — Confirms Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Daughters Granted Equal Share in Joint Family Property Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the plaintiffs, who are the sons and daughters of Mahalingappa Wali, seeking a share in the joint family p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings. Court holds that second wife and her children are entitled to share in joint family property as coparceners under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the first wife and her daughters against the husband and his second wife and children. The trial court and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Trial Court Decree Dismissing Suit as Not Maintainable. Father Cannot Execute Will Over Ancestral Property to Defeat Son's Right by Birth Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appellant/plaintiff, Karthikeyan, filed a suit for partition seeking a ½ share in the suit properties, claiming they were ancestral coparcenary p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Preliminary Decree Granting 1/3rd Share to Plaintiffs. Court holds that plaintiffs established their claim over ancestral property and that the suit was not barred by limitation.

The appeal arises from a preliminary decree passed in O.S.No.32/2015 by the Senior Civil Judge, Sirsi, decreeing the suit for partition. The plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Benami Property Dispute Under Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Property Was Held for Benefit of Hindu Undivided Family Coparceners Under Section 4(3)(a), Making Suit Barred Under Section 4(1).

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by Laxmi Prasad, his wife, and two daughters against his two sons and subsequent purchasers, seeking de...