Search Results for "continuous supervision"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by State Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Cases. Daily Wage Workers' Regularisation Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Pune, and the State of Maharashtra, challenged a common order dated 18 January 1999 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010137632012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Deeper SIT Probe and Enforces State Compliance in Jojari River Contamination Case. Court Flags Systemic Regulatory Failures and Orders Invocation of Graver Penal Provisions Under Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of alarming environmental contamination in the Jojari River and other water bodies in Rajasthan, reportedly...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Challenging Reinstatement Order. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor System, Termination Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 17/9/1999, which reversed the Labou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Against Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam — Reinstatement with 30% Back Wages Upheld for Directly Engaged Gardeners. Termination During Conciliation Proceedings Violated Section 6E of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves appeals by workmen (Gardeners) and the employer (Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam) against a High Court judgment modifying Labour Court awards....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...