Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

914 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 914 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Award declared firm dissolved on a date not claimed by any party and failed to consider crucial evidence regarding partnership property.

5 Jun 2017

The Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges an arbitral award dated 1st August 2006. The petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Partial Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Non-Signatory Principal Held Liable Based on Agency Relationship and Implied Consent.

3 Nov 2025

The appeals arose from three arbitral awards passed in disputes relating to the construction of mustard seed processing and storage silos in Rajasthan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in International Commercial Arbitration for Violation of Natural Justice and Patent Illegality. The court found that the arbitrator relied on unproved documents and denied adequate opportunity to the petitioner, warranting setting aside of the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Thomas Cook (India) Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Case — Upholds Arbitral Award Despite Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses. Court Holds That Where Multiple Agreements Contain Different Arbitration Clauses, a Common Arbitrator Can Be Appointed with Consent, and the Award Is Not Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2020

The dispute arose between Quippo Construction Equipment Ltd. (appellant) and Janardan Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) concerning four agreements for hir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Section 34 Petition Against Foreign Award; Preliminary Objection Raised Pending Determination. Arbitration Agreement Existence and Enforcement of Foreign Award Under Part II Also Examined.

8 Apr 2015

The dispute arose from a voyage charter party dated 13 September 2008 between Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft & Company...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Section 9 Petition in Post-Foreign Award Enforcement Against Guarantor Deleted from Proceedings. Court Examines Applicability of Group of Companies Doctrine to Bind Non-Signatory for Interim Relief.

28 Jan 2026

The petition was filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Ningbo Aux Imp & Exp Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, seeking inte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sub-Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Appellate Bench Decision of Bombay Stock Exchange. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitral tribunal and appellate bench are not liable to be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

9 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Actal, a sole proprietorship concern engaged in trading in shares, insurance, bonds, mutual funds, etc., was associated with the ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Arbitral Award Upholding Initialled Joint Executing Agreement as Valid Arbitration Agreement. Initialling and Conduct Found to Evidence Mutual Assent, Establishing Binding Contract Under Section 7, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from a consortium formed by M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (M3), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (P...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute Between Cooperative Housing Society and Developer. Court Upholds Award on Termination of Agreement and Refund of Deposit but Sets Aside Directions for Possession and Appointment of Receiver.

7 Jan 2020

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions and a notice of motion filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)