Search Results for "consensus"

592 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 592 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.

The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11(6) Application and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Property Sale Dispute. Arbitration clauses in MOU and Agreement for Sale held prima facie valid, and dispute referred to arbitration despite respondent's objection regarding non-signing of agreement.

The applicant, Bhupinder Singh Balwant Singh, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Licensing Conditions on Orchestra Bars Under Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Gender-Based Numerical Restrictions on Performers Held Valid as Reasonable Restrictions in Public Interest Under Article 19(6) of the Constitution.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Bombay that upheld conditions imposed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on orchestr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Developer in Redevelopment Dispute — Restrains Cooperative Society from Terminating Letter of Intent Pending Arbitration. Termination of Development Agreement Found Prima Facie Invalid Under Section 9 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Kalpataru Ltd, a real estate development company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Oral Agreement Not Proved. Plaintiff failed to establish oral agreement, payment of consideration, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellants (original defendant nos. 2 to 4) challenged the judgment and decree dated 18/02/2014 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Arbitration Petitions Challenging Award on Family Settlement MOU — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Interpretation of MOU Clauses but Sets Aside Award on Certain Claims as Beyond Scope of Reference.

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a sole arbitrator's awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Finding that Crane Hirer is Not a 'Dealer' Under Lease Act. Transaction of Hiring Crane with Operator is a Works Contract, Not a Sale of Right to Use Goods.

The case involves a reference under the Maharashtra Sales Tax on Transfer of Right to Use Any Goods for Any Purpose Act, 1985 (Lease Act). The respond...