Search Results for "conditional acceptance"

340 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 340 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Minutes of Meeting Converted Force Majeure Clause into Assured Return Mechanism, Interpreting Clauses 3.4.19 and 3.7.2 of Construction Agreement. Appeal Challenges Arbitral Interpretation That State Must Compensate for Any Toll Collection Drop Exceeding 20%.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a dispute concerning a build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petition Against Tender Reinvitation for Runway Work; Arbitrary Change in 'Similar Work' Definition Alleged to Exclude Lowest Bidder

The petitioner, M/s. J. M. Mhatre Infra Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020032022013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows BEST and EVEY Appeals in Electric Bus Tender Dispute. Tender Condition Requiring 200 Km Range in Actual Conditions Upheld as Valid and Non-Arbitrary.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by BEST and EVEY Trans Pvt. Ltd. and set aside the Bombay High Court's order dated 05.07.2022. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Limitation and Acknowledgment of Debt. Defendant's Application for Leave to Defend Allowed Subject to Deposit of 50% of Suit Amount Under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiffs, Carl Pinto De Andrade and others, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Ventura Securities Limited for recovery of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Price Escalation and Interest Claims. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Clause 70C and Discretion on Quantum Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, a consortium of M/s. Valecha Engineering Limited and M/s. AMA Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, Airports A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale in Favor of Flat Purchaser Against Developer and Subsequent Purchasers. Agreement for Sale dated 6th March 1980 declared valid and binding, subsequent agreement dated 4th April 1988 declared bogus and invalid.

The case involves a dispute over the specific performance of an agreement for sale of a flat. The flat purchaser, Dr. Arun Subrao Prabhu, entered into...