Search Results for "compromise terms"

1390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Order Recording Settlement in Arbitration Challenge. Parties Bound by Compromise Under Order XXIII Rules 1 & 3 CPC; No Appeal Lies Against Consent Order.

The appellant, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Antony Waste Handling Cell Pvt. Ltd., f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Allowing Additional Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 4 CPC. Trial Court's Discretion to Permit Proof of Compromise Deed Executed After Evidence Closed Upheld as Not Perverse.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original defendant, challenged an order dated 10 March 2017 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Khandala, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Disputed Consent Terms. Consent Decree Set Aside as Court Failed to Verify Genuineness of Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 28 September 2012, which made absolute a motion for recordi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal: Stranger to Compromise Decree Can Challenge It by Separate Suit — Order 23 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Bar Such Suit

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the appellant, Triloki Nath Singh, seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 15 September 1994 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Compromise Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioners Failed to Prove Fraud or Misrepresentation. Challenge to Compromise Decree Under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC Dismissed as Not Maintainable and Time-Barred.

The petitioners, Sri Shivarudrappa and Sri S. Somashekar, were defendants No.1 and 3 in O.S.No.24/2011, a suit for partition filed by the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat for Abuse of Process. Court finds that a compromise decree passed in Lok Adalat without proper verification of parties and without ensuring free consent is a nullity and liable to be set aside under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Smt. Akkubai, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of a compromise decree da...