Search Results for "cheque dishonor"

83 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act as Material Alteration Defence Fails Due to Drawer’s Knowledge. Court Relies on Accused’s Own Photocopy Showing Alteration to Conclude That Alteration Pre-Existed Issuance, Thus No Violation of Section 87.

The case arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by the respondent against the petitioner for dishonou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors of Company Not Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Mr. H.S. Bedi and Mrs. Av...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner challenging the judgment dated 31.10.2012 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 of N.I. Act Stands Unless Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Sri Rangaswamy, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 15...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Allegations of Active Role in Business Conduct.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Mr. H.S. Bedi (Managing Director) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Cheque Dishonour, Grants Conditional Leave to Defend. Court holds that in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, the defendant must show a triable issue or substantial defence to obtain unconditional leave to defend.

The Plaintiff, Tiscon Realty Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit (No. 34 of 2021) against the Defendants, C. G. Edifice (a partnership fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Revisional Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perverse. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding legally enforceable debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (Smt. Y.C. Manju) against the revision petitioner (Sunil Yadav) under Section 138 of the Nego...