Search Results for "cessed building"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "cessed building"

60 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.

23 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Orders for Unauthorized Construction in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Case. Court Held That Stop Work Orders and Demolition Notices Were Valid as Appellant Failed to Obtain Required Permission Under Section 347 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

22 Sep 2016

The appellant, United Construction, a partnership firm, purchased a building known as 'Roop Niketan' (now 'Shanidev') located at Colaba, Mumbai, by a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Terminal Benefits Withheld Due to Pending Criminal Proceedings - No Rule Authorizes Withholding of Retirement Dues. The court held that in the absence of any rule, the respondent cannot withhold terminal benefits of a retired employee solely because of pending criminal proceedings.

12 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Narayan G. Mahajan, retired as Executive Engineer from the Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) on 31.02.2011. His...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Letter of Intent for Cluster Redevelopment Under DCR 33(9) — No Violation of Tenant Rights Found. Petitioner's claim of illegalities in documents and failure to execute permanent alternate accommodation agreements rejected as premature and lacking merit.

2 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Mr Murtuza Shabbir Tinwala, a resident and tenant in the Bhendi Bazaar Area, filed a Writ Petition challenging the Letter of Intent (L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

19 Mar 2015

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Government Resolution Paragraph 12 Does Not Require Consent of All Tenants for Redevelopment Scheme. The Court held that the requirement of consent under paragraph 12 of the Government Resolution dated 3rd December, 2001 is not a condition precedent for the grant of permission for redevelopment and that the authorities must consider the application on merits.

18 Jul 2014

The petitioners, tenants of a building known as Bori Chawl situated at Ram Tekdi Road, Sewri, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Petition Quashing MHADA Circular Imposing Additional Premium on Redevelopment. Circular dated 17-10-2007 held ultra vires and not applicable retrospectively to societies which had already obtained NOC, IOD, and Commencement Certificate.

26 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Vishva-Villa Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, owned a plot o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

28 Nov 2011

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

23 Jun 2011

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)