Search Results for "candidate selection"

1298 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1298 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Shiksha Karmis in Bias and Natural Justice Conflict. Breach of Audi Alteram Partem Cured by Revisional Hearing Where No Actual Bias Proved Under Section 40(c) of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993.

The case involves four civil appeals arising from a split verdict of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of appointments of Shiksha Karmi (Grade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Provisional Selection List in University Appointment Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Roster — Backlog Posts Must Be Filled in Accordance with Karnataka Reservation of Appointments or Posts (Amendment) Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Shri Venu S. A., challenged a provisional selection list dated 12-07-2023 issued by the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection List for Ayurvedic Medical Officer Posts. Court holds that the selection process was fair and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the preparation of the merit list.

The petitioner, a BAMS qualified doctor working temporarily under the National Health Mission, challenged the selection list for 9 posts of Ayurvedic ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging DGP Appointment in Punjab, Upholds UPSC Selection Process. Appointment Valid as Empanelment Followed Supreme Court Directions in Prakash Singh Case and Draft Guidelines, with No Proven Bias or Arbitrariness.

The dispute arose from the appointment of Mr. Dinkar Gupta as Director General of Police (Head of Police Force) for Punjab in 2019, challenged by appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Reappointment of District Forum Presidents Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 10(2) of the Act Prescribes a Single Term of Five Years or Until Age 65, Barring Reappointment.

The judgment addresses a common question arising in multiple writ petitions: whether the President of a District Forum constituted under Section 10 of...