SPECIAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2001
6 Jan 2015The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, presided over by Justice Roshan Dalvi, heard Special Case No. ...
Search Results for "breach"
7638 result(s) found
Found 7638 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order Directing Civil Imprisonment for Breach of Temporary Injunction Under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Lower Court Found That Appellants Violated Injunction by Completing Construction and Creating Third-Party Interests Despite Court Restraints.
9 Mar 2005This appeal from order arose from a contempt application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The original plaintif...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Transporter Liable for Breach of Trust in Delivery of Goods Without Discharged Lorry Receipts — Plaintiff's Claim for Price of Goods Against Consignee and Transporter Partly Decreed. The court found that the transporter's failure to obtain discharged lorry receipts constituted breach of contract of carriage and breach of trust, making it jointly and severally liable with the consignee for the price of the goods.
11 May 2012The plaintiff, National Textile Corporation Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs.84,931.48 with interest against defendant No.1 (K.L. Kapadia), the c...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Eating House License for Violation of Natural Justice. Licensee Not Present During Alleged Obscene Acts; Suspension Without Notice and Hearing Set Aside Under Bombay Police Act, 1951.
23 Nov 2011The petitioner, Ramarai Rammilan Rai, was a co-licensee of an eating house known as 'Missile Restaurant and Bar' in Goregaon, Mumbai, holding a licens...
- 94
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Whether Commercial Dispute Can Give Rise to Criminal Proceedings; Cites Apex Court Precedent on Distinction Between Breach of Contract and Cheating. The Petition Seeks Quashing of FIR Registered Under Sections 406, 420, 120B, and 34 IPC Arising Out of Allegedly Defective Bus Supply, With the Court Examining the Abuse of Process Doctrine.
9 Nov 2022The matter arose from a commercial dispute between Scania Commercial Vehicles India Pvt. Ltd. (the manufacturer/seller) and K.T. Rajashekar, proprieto...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Bunkers Supply — Holds That Bunkers Are Necessaries and Arrest Valid Under Admiralty Jurisdiction. The court upheld the arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace for a claim for bunkers supplied as necessaries, affirming the High Court's inherent admiralty jurisdiction.
30 Nov -0001The case involves an admiralty suit filed by Lufeng Shipping Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, against the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, a Panamanian-flag vesse...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of Security Deposit in Leave and License Agreement — Defendant's Defense Raises No Triable Issues. Court holds that under Order XXXVII CPC, a defendant must disclose a substantial defense to obtain leave to defend; mere allegations of oral agreements or set-off without evidence do not constitute a triable issue.
20 Sep 2023The plaintiff, Play Games 24X7 Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Loran L...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Zee Entertainment for Misuse of Confidential TV Show Concept and Copyright Infringement. Plaintiffs established prima facie case of breach of confidence and copyright infringement in concept note for 'Badki Bahu' serial.
25 Mar 2015The plaintiffs, Beyond Dreams Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, filed a suit against Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. and another for preve...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Applications for Deletion of Defendants. The Court Examines Whether Directors and Former Employees Are Necessary Parties in a Suit for Breach of Contract Under Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
22 Jan 2026The matter concerns a writ petition filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Pipeline Construction Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
9 Mar 2012The petitioner, Mahanagar Gas Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 5th March 2010 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...
- 63
