Search Results for "borrower default"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "borrower default"

379 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 379 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Matter — Upholds Bank's Possession for Non-Performing Asset. Held that DRT's refusal to grant interim relief was not perverse or without jurisdiction, and the petition under Article 226/227 was not maintainable as alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act was available.

13 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Prakashbhai Baldevbhai Patel and another, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Stamp Duty Dispute — Single Mortgage Deed Covering Multiple Loan Agreements Constitutes One Instrument Under Section 4 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Revisional Authority's Order Levying Deficit Stamp Duty and Penalty Quashed as Loan Agreements Were Ancillary to Principal Mortgage Deed.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Neepa Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., and its group company Sheth Creators Pvt. Ltd., engaged in real estate, sought financial assistance from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale Due to Alternative Remedy and Suppression of Facts. Petitioner, a Director and Shareholder of Mortgagor Company, Failed to Disclose Rejection of OTS and Auction Sale, Leading to Dismissal with Costs.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Archana Wani, a director and shareholder of respondent No. 5 (N. Kumar Housing and Infrastructures), filed a writ petition under A...

High Court

High Court Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Staying SARFAESI Proceedings — Deputy Commissioner Cannot Review or Stay Section 14 Order Under SARFAESI Act, 2002. The Deputy Commissioner acted without jurisdiction by entertaining a borrower's representation and staying an order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

12 Oct 2022

The petitioner, DCB Bank Limited, had lent money to one A.C. Santhosh, who defaulted on loan repayments, causing the account to become a non-performin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.

2 Apr 2019

The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition in Vandana Global Limited v. IL & FS Financial Services Limited — Disputed Debt and Bona Fide Defence. The court held that a winding up petition should not be admitted when the debt is bona fide disputed and the defence is substantial, requiring dismissal of the petition.

12 Mar 2018

The appeal arose from an order dated 5 January 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in Company Petition No.923 of 2015, whereby the petition filed ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2017

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)