Search Results for "benefit under Section 14(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "benefit under Section 14(2)"

1041 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1041 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Single Judge Order on Maintainability of Private Complaints Against Public Servants Under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Single Judge Had Ruled That the Karnataka Lokayukta Act Does Not Expressly Exclude the Operation of Alternative Measures and There Is No Repugnancy With the Code of Criminal Procedure.

29 Nov 2013

The case originated from private complaints filed by the respondent, Sirajin Basha, against the appellant, B.S. Yeddyurappa, a former Chief Minister o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

25 Mar 2015

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Income Tax Appeals Filed by Assessee and Revenue Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Multiple Appeals Clubbed for Hearing Involving Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.

25 Mar 2015

...

High Court

Income Tax Appeals by Wipro Limited and Revenue Against Orders of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore for Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005

25 Mar 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SRA Acquisition Notice for Church Land, Upholds Owner's Preferential Right to Redevelop Slum. The Court held that the owner of slum land has a preferential right to redevelop the land under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority cannot acquire the land for a private developer without considering the owner's proposal.

11 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a public trust managing Mount Mary's Church in Bandra, Mumbai, owned land admeasuring 9371.30 sq. meters, out of which 1596.40 sq. met...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

17 Dec 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

17 Dec 2014

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal by Charitable Society Regarding Leave to Institute Suit Under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Dispute Involves Whether a Society Registered Under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 Can Be Treated as a Trust and Sought Determination of the Conditions for Granting Leave Following Allegations of Financial Mismanagement and Breach of Trust.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a suit instituted under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by two plaintiffs, Dr. Shelly Batra and Mrs. Usha Gupta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)