Search Results for "award not speaking"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "award not speaking"

1099 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1099 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Working Journalists Act Case Excluding Perquisites from Gratuity Calculation. Ex-Employee's Gratuity Claim Not Barred; Car Allowance, Free Telephone and Newspapers Not Wages Under Section 2(rr) of the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955.

2 Apr 1969

The dispute arose out of a claim for gratuity and leave compensation filed by a former special correspondent of Bennett Coleman & Co. (P) Ltd. under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicated Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute. The Award Held Lessee Liable for Tax Demands Arising from Disallowance of Depreciation Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

9 Jan 2015

The matter pertains to an arbitration petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicatur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Dispute involves multiple hotel management agreements and the applicability of arbitration clauses after partial setting aside of a prior award.

17 Dec 2025

The dispute arises from a series of hotel management agreements concerning a hotel at Lonavala owned by petitioner Laguna Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (formerly ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal to Set Aside Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court Holds That Challenge to Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy Must Be Based on Clear Violation of Law or Contract, Not Mere Erroneous Application of Law.

22 Dec 2017

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Bid in Tender Process for Distribution Franchisee — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action by State Entity. The court quashed the disqualification of the petitioner's bid due to non-submission of power of attorney in prescribed format, holding that the respondent failed to provide prior notice or opportunity to explain.

28 Jul 2010

The petitioner, A2Z Maintenance & Engineering Services Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of its bid by the Maharashtra S...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory. Group of Companies Doctrine Not Applicable Without Evidence of Mutual Intention to Bind Non-Signatory Under Sections 47-49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a UAE company, filed an appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act and Section 50 of the Arbitra...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Challenge to Arbitral Award Directing Payment of Rs.9,28,188.45 with Interest. The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from a member-client dispute over stock market transactions and margin shortfalls.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)