Search Results for "armed robbery"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Conspiracy Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 120-B, 395, 397 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 11th May 1987 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, whereby ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as testimony of prosecutrix failed to inspire confidence.

The case involves two appeals filed by Samundersing Mahipal Sing and Rajnishkumar Sureshchandra Kumar against their conviction by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder in Unlawful Assembly Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained Under Section 302 read with 149 IPC. Common Object of Assault Proved Despite Acquittal for Robbery Under Section 396 IPC.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Dhondiram Balu Dhotre, Satish Vithal Dhotre, Ashok Balu Dhotre, and Vitthal Balu Dhotre (original accu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Beersingh Jagatsingh, was convicted by the 8th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Seweree, Bombay in Sessions Case No. 548 of 2006 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Single Axe Blow on Head Not Sufficient to Establish Intent to Kill Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Yogesh Hanmant Madane, was convicted by the Trial Court under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of the deceased...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Satisfactory Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a single incident where a group of individuals allegedly formed an unlawful assembly a...