Search Results for "animal preservation"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of public order impact.

The petitioner, Abdulkadir Ibrahim Sabu, was preventively detained by an order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the District Magistrate, Chhota Udepur, clas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order.

The petitioner, Abdulbhai Alias Barko Jusabbhai Shama, was preventively detained by an order dated 05.01.2026 passed by the District Magistrate, Devbh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention of 'Cruel Person' Under Section 2(bbb) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Irfanali Baksuali Saiyad, was preventively detained by the District Magistrate, Anand, vide order dated 24.12.2025, classifying him as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Detenue in Preventive Detention Case Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention Order Quashed as Passed Mechanically Without Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Farukbhai Musabhai Ghavda (Muslim), was preventively detained by the District Magistrate, Devbhoomi Dwarka, Khambhaliya, under an orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Withdrawal of PIL Seeking Enforcement of Pet Waste Management Bye-laws as Infructuous. Court Emphasizes Its Duty to Examine Public Interest Before Permitting Withdrawal of a Public Interest Litigation.

The petitioner, M/S Compassion Unlimited Plus Action (CUPA), an NGO registered under the Indian Trusts Act, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wildlife Protection Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 39 and 40 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of animal articles beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioner, Boraiah @ Boregowda @ Papanna, was originally acquitted by the trial court (Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Gundlupet) in C.C.No.494/200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...