Search Results for "agricultural marketing board"

154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Sections 74 and 75(1) of Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and Common Cadre Service Rules for Cooperative Societies. The Court held that the impugned provisions and rules are constitutionally valid and do not violate Article 19(1)(c) or Article 43B of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 74 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Retrospective Withdrawal of Export Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Cancellation of Transport and Marketing Assistance Scheme Violates Legitimate Expectation and Promissory Estoppel, Unreasonable Classification Under Article 14.

The petitioners, exporters of agricultural products, were beneficiaries of the Transport and Marketing Assistance (TMA) Scheme introduced by the Minis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Election Programme After Notification Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Shamrao Narhari Pavale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election process of the Agricultural Produc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Agricultural Marketing Board Rules for Preferential Allotment to Displaced Dealers. Conditions of Three Years Licensing and Minimum Turnover of Rs.5 Lakhs Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14.

The case involves appeals against judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning the validity and interpretation of the Punjab State Agricu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Postponement of APMC Elections Due to Non-Application of Mind. State Government's Order Under Section 14(3) and (3A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Reasons.

The petitioners, who are agriculturists and office-bearers of cooperative societies that are members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APM...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Dropping Land Acquisition Proceedings in Collusion Case — Land Reserved for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Since 1993 Cannot Be Released Without Following Statutory Procedure Under MRTP Act, 1966.

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Anjangaon Surji, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Land Acquisition Officer, Minor ...