Search Results for "Work Assistants"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty Order by Head Master in Private School Employment Dispute -- Assistant Teacher Challenges Withheld Increment Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act 1977 and Rules 1981 -- Head Master Lacks Authority to Impose Penalty Without Management Resolution

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher in a private school, challenged a penalty order imposed by the Head Master that withheld his annual increment -- ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Withdrawal of incentive bonus without lawful revision held to be unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its General Manager of BEST, challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Municipal Notice Case — Lack of Delegation of Powers Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Notice Issued by Assistant Engineer Without Authorization from Commissioner Held Invalid Under Section 381 of the Act.

The petitioner, Kishanlal Udaylal Jain, through his power of attorney holder, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Application for Perjury Proceedings Against Wife in Family Court Appeal. False statements in pleadings alone do not warrant prosecution under Section 340 Cr.P.C. without proof of intentional falsehood and necessity for prosecution.

The applicant, Dr. Santosh Chandrashekar Shetty (husband), filed a Civil Application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...