Search Results for "Wild Life Protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Wild Life Protection"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Eviction of Encroachers and Restoration of Forest Lands in Tamil Nadu's Agasthyamalai Landscape — CEC Reports Widespread Illegal Occupation by Government Employees and Slow Implementation of Court Orders. The Court emphasized the need for time-bound eviction, disciplinary action against government encroachers, and monthly review by the Chief Secretary to ensure compliance with forest and wildlife laws.

29 May 2026

The Supreme Court was hearing civil appeals concerning two issues: preservation of Reserve Forests, Wildlife Sanctuaries, and Tiger Reserves in Tamil ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Forest Land Injunction Suit Due to Illegal Transfer and Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Transfer of Settlement Land Without Prior Sanction Under Indian Forest Act, 1927, is Void, and Possession Under Such Agreement Does Not Confer Title or Invoke Part Performance Protection Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

23 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from a second appeal filed by the plaintiff-appellant against concurrent judgments of the lower courts dismissing a suit for permane...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Intervenes in High Court Order on Forest Conservation and Worker Rehabilitation in Tamil Nadu. The Court directed the High Court to conclusively address forest restoration under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980, while balancing rehabilitation claims of displaced tea estate workers from a declared tiger reserve.

24 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of petitions concerning two primary issues: the preservation of reserve forests, wildlife sanctuaries, and tiger r...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs States to Ensure Basic Toilet Facilities in All Court Premises Under Article 21 — Right to Dignity Includes Access to Sanitation. The Court held that the right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to sanitation, and the State must provide and maintain clean, accessible toilets for all genders including transgender persons and persons with disabilities in all court complexes.

17 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions to all States and Un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Possessing Panther Skin Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Possession of Scheduled Animal Skin Without License is an Offence Under Sections 40, 44, 48A, 49B, 51 of the Act.

21 Dec 2023

The applicants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Joint Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amravati, for contravention of Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed for Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Innocent Possession. The court held that the burden under Section 69 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of forest produce is established, and the applicant failed to rebut the presumption that the teakwood was government property.

5 Oct 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Wildlife Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 9 read with Section 51 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as recovery of leopard skin not witnessed by independent persons and mandatory provisions of Act not complied with.

8 Aug 2023

The case pertains to three revision applications filed by Vinod Diwakar Sontakke, Kuldip Madhukar Chaudhari, and Shridhar Kawadu Yerawar against the j...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Wild Life Protection Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Conviction for Possession of Leopard Skin Under Section 9 Read with Section 51 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Set Aside as Evidence of Seizure and Recovery Was Unreliable.

8 Aug 2023

The case involves three revision applications filed by Vinod Diwakar Sontakke, Kuldip Madhukar Chaudhari, and Shridhar Kawadu Yerawar against their co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landowner's Appeal in Eco-sensitive Zone Case, Upholding NGT's Reliance on Expert Committee Report. The Court affirmed the National Green Tribunal's jurisdiction and application of the precautionary principle under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, regarding the Zonal Master Plan 2030 for Mount Abu.

12 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed appeals under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, arising from NGT judgments dated 10 March 2021 and 29 J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Dispute Over Wildlife Sanctuary Exclusion. The Court found no error apparent in its earlier judgment that denied damages to the appellant due to lack of rights after the 1976 notification under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

5 Feb 2020

The review petition arose from a land dispute where the appellant, M/s. Natesan Agencies (Plantations), had taken land on lease from Sri Nanamamalai J...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)